New bill to try to enforce clean drinking water
A boy on his way home with a drum filled with water from a private borehole. Behind him are empty reservoirs meant to supply homes in Mazista, Kgetlengrivier Municipality. Archive photo: Steve Kretzman

Home » New bill to try to enforce clean drinking water

New bill to try to enforce clean drinking water

Currently the Department of Water and Sanitation cannot directly intervene when municipalities fail to supply drinking water up to standard

18-01-24 11:40
New bill to try to enforce clean drinking water
A boy on his way home with a drum filled with water from a private borehole. Behind him are empty reservoirs meant to supply homes in Mazista, Kgetlengrivier Municipality. Archive photo: Steve Kretzman

Almost two-thirds of water-supplying municipalities (94 of 144) were failing to provide clean drinking water to residents in 2022. In 61 municipalities water treatment and supply was in “a critical state” according to the latest Blue Drop Report. Yet the Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) cannot intervene directly to address this.

  • Almost two-thirds of municipalities were failing to meet minimum drinking water standards in 2022.
  • Currently, the only recourse the national water department has is to request that a provincial authority take over the responsibility for water supply.
  • Now a new bill before Parliament seeks to strengthen the department’s powers.

Under current water legislation, the department’s only recourse is for the minister “in consultation with the Minister for Provincial Affairs and Constitutional Development” to “request the relevant Province to intervene in terms of section 139 of the Constitution”.

A section 139 process allows the provincial government to place a municipality under administration if it fails to meet its constitutional obligations. This process is time consuming and requires much political will.

Associate professor Germarie Viljoen, a senior law lecturer specialising in water law at North-West University, says she is “rather sceptical” about the effectiveness of the section 139 process, “given the urgency often associated with water services”.

“The reliance on time-sensitive decisions and political motivations makes it an uncertain solution in many instances,” said Viljoen.

It requires one tier of government holding another to account, which “may not always be forthcoming”. A provincial Member of the Executive Council (MEC) for local government has to demand information from an errant municipality, conduct investigations, and assume responsibility for enforcing minimum norms and standards.

New Bill

The Water Services Amendment Bill, introduced to Parliament in November, seeks to strengthen enforcement by allowing the department to issue directives to municipalities that fail to provide clean drinking water.

Should a municipality not comply with a directive to meet minimum standards within the required time frame, the Bill would allow the water minister to appoint “any water services institution” to take over “all the duties” related to water provision. This includes operations, maintenance, refurbishment and expansion, as well as billing and revenue, procurement, supply chain management, and human resources.

Any expenses incurred may be recovered from the municipality.

But similar directives issued under the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) – for failure to meet wastewater treatment standards – have often been ignored or have taken years before having an effect. Many municipalities fail to even respond to such directives.

DWS spokesperson Mavasa Wisane said of 88 notices and directives issued to municipalities in the 2022 financial year for pollution of the environment, 71 “remain unaddressed”. Wisane said of the 17 municipalities that did respond, only eight provided representations that “adequately addressed the concerns raised”.

She said the DWS was conducting follow-ups on the notices and directives issued to ascertain compliance, and would take “further enforcement action” if required.

The DWS had also opened nine criminal cases against municipalities in the 2022 financial year for polluting water sources, and a further ten in the 2023 financial year. None of these cases have been finalised.

Regarding directives that would flow from the Water Services Amendment Bill, Center for Environmental Rights candidate attorney Adelaide Chagopa said, “If the Bill passes in its current iteration, I personally do not think the directives clause will immediately make much of a difference.”

Chagopa said the department’s capacity to hold scores of failing municipalities to account was questionable. However, this issue might be addressed during the Bill’s comment process.

She said she believed punitive measures were necessary to hold municipalities responsible for providing clean drinking water. “I don’t know what punitive measures would or should look like in law but I do believe there is a need for more severe consequences for failure to discharge functions,” she said.

ALSO READ: ActionSA plans to fix overcrowding and placement crisis in schools

Wisane said most public consultations for the Water Services Amendment Bill, as well as the National Water Amendment Bill currently before Parliament, would take place in February. Once the necessary updates were made, it would have to be resubmitted to Cabinet for approval to submit to Parliament and proceed through the parliamentary processes. She indicated the process may be slowed by it being dealt with during an election year.

Published originally on Groundup | Steve Kretzmann